Abstract
Introduction
Advantages of Using a MiRNA Diagnostic Colon Cancer Screening Test
The expression of individual genes may be altered by mutations in the DNA, or by a change in their regulation at the RNA or protein levels [1]. Epigenetic silencing is an important mechanism that contributes to gene inactivation in colorectal cancer (CRC) [2]. Analysis of promoter methylation of hypermethylated in cancer 1 (HIC1) gene in human stool showed it to be highly specific (98%) for both colon adenoma and carcinoma [3], but the sensitivity was quite low (31% for adenoma & 42% for all cancer), suggesting that an epigenetic marker only is not adequate for an accurate diagnostic screening, but a combination of genetic and epigenetic markers would be required to reliably identify CRC at an early disease stage [4]. Working with the stable DNA has been relatively easy compared to working with the fragile RNA molecule [1].A study by scientists at Exact Sciences Corp, Marlborough, MA, which markets a mutation-based DNA test “Cologuard”, assessed a newer version of a fecal DNA test for CRC screening using a vimentin methylation marker and another mutation DY marker plus nondegraded DNA in a limited sample of 44 CRC patients and 122 normal controls [5].It cited a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 82%, only for advanced cancer, but not for the early adenoma stage. Besides, DNA mutation tests are not cost-effective, as screening for multiple mutations is expensive because these demanding mutation tests are not automated and are labor intensive. In addition, mutation detection in oncogenes and suppressor genes suffers from: a) the detection of mutations in these genes in fewer than half of large adenomas and carcinomas, b) the detection of gene mutations in non-neoplastic tissues, c) mutations found only in a portion of the tumor, and d) mutations often produce changes in the expression of many other genes [6,7]. Protein-based methods are currently not suited for screening and early diagnosis, either because proteins are not specific to one tumor or tissue type (e.g., CEA), their susceptibility to proteases, current lack of means to amplify proteins, no function is known for more than 75% of predicted proteins of multicellular organisms, there is not always a direct correlation between protein abundance and activity, and most importantly because detection of these markers exfoliately often signifies the presence of an advanced tumor stage. The dynamic range of protein expression in minimally-invasive body fluids (e.g., blood) is as large as 1010. Moreover, mRNA levels do not necessarily correlate with protein expressions.
Protein microarray studies revealed that protein expression vastly exceeds RNA levels, and only post translationally modified proteins are involved in signal transduction pathways leading to tumorigenesis. There is no well-documented protein test that has been shown in clinical trials to be a sensitive and a specific indicator of colon neoplasia, especially in early stages [8]. A serum proteomic study employing liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) carried out in a non-biased fashion failed to differentiate between individuals with large adenoma ( 1 cm) and normal individuals [9]. Compared to nucleic acids, proteomic research is a newer discipline; therefore, it will take considerable time to identify and validate proteins suitable for use as clinical markers, and resolve issues of bias and validations [10].On the other hand, a transcriptomic mRNA approach, has been shown to detect both adenomas and colon carcinomas with high sensitivity and specificity in preliminary studies [1], but no randomized, standardized, blinded prospective clinical studies have been carried out to validate the superiority of the mRNA approach.
A study indicated that a combination of a transcriptomic mRNA and miRNA expression signatures improves biomolecular classification of CRC [11]. Furthermore, not only does miRNAs regulate mRNA, but they also regulate protein expression. Two studies have shown that a single miRNA act as a rheostat to fine tune the expression of hundreds of proteins [12,13]. Hence, for CRC screening, miRNA markers are much more comprehensive and preferable to a DNA-, epigenetic-, mRNA- or a protein-based marker [14-18]. An added advantage for the use of the stable, nondegradable miRNAs by PCR expression, by chip-based methods, is its being automatable, making them much more economical and more easily acceptable by laboratory personnel performing these assays [4]. The discovery of small non-coding protein sequences,17-27 nucleotides long RNAs (microRNAs), has opened new opportunities for developing a non-invasive screening test for early diagnosis of many cancers. The latest miRbase release 22 on, March 12, 2018 [http://ww.mirbase.org] indicates the total number of miRNAs labeled “high confidence” has increased by 168, to 1996, than in the previous release [19].
MiRNA functions seem regulate development [20], apoptosis [21], and specific miRNAs are essential in oncogenesis [22,23], effective in classifying solid [24-26] and liquid tumors [27,28], and could serve as oncogenes or suppressor genes [29]. MiRNA genes are frequently found at fragile sites, as well as minimal regions of loss of heterozygosity, or amplification of common break-point regions [30], implying their involvement in carcinogenesis. MiRNAs have potential to serve as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis and/or response to therapy [31,32]. Profiles of miRNA expression differ between normal and tumor tissues (33,34), suggesting that their expression profiles cluster similar tumor types together more accurately than expression profiles of protein-coding mRNA genes [33,34]. A study that examined global expression of 735 miRNAs in 315 samples of normal colonic mucosa, tubulovillus adenomas, adenocarcinomas proficient in DNA mismatch repair (pMMR), and defective in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) representing sporadic and inherited CRC stages I-IV suggest involvement of common biologic pathways in pMMR and dMMR tumors in spite of the presence of numerous molecular differences between them, including differences at the miRNA level; indicating the need to pay attention to mismatch DNA repair (MMR) [34] .
Unlike screening for large numbers of messenger (m)RNA [1], a modest number of miRNAs is used to differentiate cancer from normal [35], and unlike mRNA, miRNAs in stool remain largely intact and stable for detection [36], therefore, leading to conclude that miRNA molecules are better markers to use for developing a reliable noninvasive diagnostic marker screen for colon cancer [14-18], since: a) the presence of the bacterium Escherichia coli does not hinder detection of miRNA by a sensitive technique such as dPCR [36], and b) the miRNA expression patterns are the same in primary tumor, or diseased tissue, as in stool samples [35-37]. The gold standard to which the miRNA test is compared to, has been “colonoscopy”, obtained from patients’ medical records [38]. However, because the low sensitivity guaiac FOBT is still the most commonly used screen in annual checkups (www.cancer.org) [39], this test should also be included for comparison with the proposed dPCR diagnostic miRNA screening approach in human stool.
Advantages of Stool Over Other Testing Media
Stool testing has several advantages over other colon cancer screening methods a s it is truly noninvasive and requires no unpleasant cathartic preparation, formal health care visits, or time away from work or routine activities [40-43]. Unlike sigmoidoscopy, it reflects the full length of the colorectum and samples can be taken in a way that represents the right and left side of the colon. It is also believed that colonocytes are released continuously and abundantly into the fecal stream, contrary to blood that is released intermittently as in guaiac fecal occult blood test (FOBT) [39]; therefore, this natural enrichment phenomenon partially obviates the need to use a laboratory-enrichment technique to enrich for tumorigenic colonocytes, as for example when blood is used for screen testing [44]. Furthermore, because testing can be performed on mail-in-specimens, geographic access stool screening is essentially unimpeded [4]. The American Cancer Society (ACS) has recognized stool-based molecular testing as a promising screening technology for CRC (www.cancer.org).Isolation of colonocytes from stool, and comparing the Agilent electrophoretic (18S and 28S) patterns to those obtained from total RNA extracted from whole stool [45-47], and differential lysis of colonocytes by RT lysis buffer (Qiagen), could be construed as a validation that the electrophoretic pattern observed in stool (18S and 28S) is truly due to the presence of human colonocytes, and not due to stool contamination with Escherichia coli (16S and 23S). Taking into account that some exsosomal RNA will be released from purified colonocytes into stool, attempts must be made to correct for exsosomal RNA effect [48].
MiRNA dPCR Study Design
To test miRNAs as reliable, quantitative, sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarkers, for early non-invasive screening of colon cancer, using absolute dPCR test, preliminary work must be validated in a study using a nested case control epidemiology design and employing a prospective specimen collection, retrospective blind evaluation (Probe) of control subjects and test colon cancer patients, as specifically delineated by the National Cancer Institute’s Early Detection Research Network http://edrn.nci.nih.gov for cancer biomarker discovery studies. Selection of 14 miRNAs, 12 of them showed increased expression and 2 showed decreased expression for analysis of absolute miRNAs expression by a chipbased digital (d) PCR test is presented in Tables 1 & 2, and Figure 1. Absolute Quantitative Digital PCR Approach Digital PCR is a new approach to miRNAs quantification that offers an alternate method to qPCR for absolute quantification, by partitioning a sample of DNA or cDNA into many individual, parallel PCR reactions; some of these reactions contain the target molecule (positive), while others do not (negative).
Figure 1: Diagram illustrating QuantStudioTM 3D Digital PCR System Chip; ChipCase Lid (1); Digital PCR 20K 10 mm2
nanofluidic v2 chip (2), which contains 20,000 reaction wells; QuantStudioTM 3D Digital PCR Chip Case (3); Chip ID (4); Fill
port (5); and Reaction wells, the 20,000 physical holes that suspend individual PCR reactions.
Table 1: Characteristics of Fourteen Up- or Down-Regulated MicroRNAs in Human Stool.
Table 2: Absolute Quantification of Up-/Down- Regulated miRNAs in Stool by QuantStudioTM 3D Chip-Based Digital PCR.
A single molecule can be amplified a million-fold or more.
During amplification, TaqMan chemistry with dye-labeled probes is
used to detect sequence-specific targets. When no target sequence
is present, no signal accumulates. Following PCR analysis, the
fraction of negative reactions is used to generate an absolute
count of the number of target molecules in the sample, without
the need for standards or endogenous controls. In conventional
qPCR, the signal from wild-type sequences dominates and obscures the
signal from rare sequences [49-51]. By minimizing the effect
of competition between targets, dPCR overcomes the difficulties
inherent to amplifying rare sequences and allows for sensitive &
precise absolute quantification of the selected miRNAs. Applied
Biosystem QuantStudio™ 3D instrument used in this research study,
only performs the imaging and primary analysis of the digital chips.
The chips themselves must be cycled offline on a Dual Flat Block
GeneAmp® 9700 PCR System. or the ProFlex™ 2x Flat PCR System.
The QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System can read the digital chip
in less than 1 minute, following thermal cycling [45].It allows for one sample per chip; although, duplexing allows for analsis of two targets per chip. Sample prep for digital PCR is no different than for real-time qPCR, when using the QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System. To figure out the concentration of cDNA stock from results, if one includes all of the necessary dilution factors into the AnalysisSuite™ software, the software will give the copies/μL in the stock. There are 2 dilutions that one needs to take into account:
a) The first is the dilution of the sample in the reaction,. and
b) The second is the dilution of the stock that one makes before adding it to the digital PCR reaction.
For example, if one wants to add 1 μL of a sample that has been diluted 1:10 from the stock. Thus, if one adds 1 μL of his/her sample to a 16 μL (final volume) reaction, the dilution factor of the sample is 1:16 or 1/16 = 0.0625. Since the stock has also been diluted 1:10 (0.1), one also need to factor this in. The final dilution factor to enter into the software is 0.0625 x 0.1 = 0.00625 (1:160). One can use either annotation to indicate the dilution factor in the AnalysisSuite™ software. If one enters that value into the “Dilution” column, the software will give the copies/μL in the starting material (stock).
The Poisson Plus algorithm for projects that contain QuantStudio™ 3D Chips with target, quantities >2000 copies/μL. The Poisson Plus algorithm corrects for well-to-well load volume variation, on a per Chip basis. This becomes important at higher target concentrations. There is also an option to export the Chip data as XML on the Export tab-thousands of discrete subunits prior to amplification by PCR, each ideally containing either zero or one (or at most, a few) template molecules [50]. Each partition behaves as an individual PCR reactions –as with real-time PCR-fluorescent FAM probes [or others, as VIC fluorescence]. Samples containing amplified products are considered positive (1, fluorescent), and those without product –with little or no fluorescence (i.e., are negative, 0). The ratio of positives to negatives in each sample is the basis of amplification. Unlike real-time qPCR, dPCR does not rely on the number of amplification cycles to determine the initial amount of template nucleic acid in each sample, but it relies on Poisson Statistics to determine the absolute template quantity.
The unique sample partitioning step of dPCR, coupled with Poisson Statistics allows for higher precision than both traditional end point PCR. and qPCR methods; thereby allowing for analysis of rare miRNA targets quantitatively and accuratley [47,48]. The use of a nanofluidic chip, shown below, provides a convenient and straight forward mechanism to run thousands of PCR reactions in parallel. Each well is loaded with a mixture of sample, master mix, and Applied Biosystems TaqMan Assay reagents, and individually analyzed to detect the presence (positive) or absence (negative) of an endpoint signal. To account for wells that may have received more than one molecule of the target sequence, a correction factor is applied using the Poisson model. It features a filter set that is optimized for the FAM™, VIC®, and ROX™ dyes, available from Life Technologies [46]. The chips themselves must be cycled offline on a Dual Flat Block GeneAmp® 9700 PCR System. or the ProFlex™ 2x Flat PCR System. The QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System can read the digital chip in less than 1 minute, following thermal cycling [45].
It allows for one sample per chip; although, duplexing allows for analsis of two targets per chip. Sample prep for digital PCR is no different than for real-time PCR, when using the Quant Studio™ 3D Digital PCR System. To figure out the concentration of cDNA stock from results, if one includes all of the necessary dilution factors into the AnalysisSuite™ software, the software will give the copies/sL in the stock. There are 2 dilutions that one needs to take into account:
a) The first is the dilution of the sample in the reaction,. and
b) The second is the dilution of the stock that one makes before adding it to the digital PCR reaction.
For example, if one wants to add 1 μL of a sample that has been diluted 1:10 from the stock. Thus, if one adds 1 μL of his/her sample to a 16 μL (final volume) reaction, the dilution factor of the sample is 1:16 or 1/16 = 0.0625. Since the stock has also been diluted 1:10 (0.1), one also need to factor this in. The final dilution factor to enter into the software is 0.0625 x 0.1 = 0.00625 (1:160). One can use either annotation to indicate the dilution factor in the AnalysisSuite™ software.
If one enters that value into the “Dilution” column, the software will give the copies/μL in the starting material (stock). The Poisson Plus algorithm for projects that contain Quant Studio™ 3D Chips with target, quantities >2000 copies/μL. The Poisson Plus algorithm corrects for well-to-well load volume variation, on a per Chip basis. This becomes important at higher target concentrations. There is also an option to export the Chip data as XML on the Export tab-thousands of discrete subunits prior to amplification by PCR, each ideally containing either zero or one (or at most, a few) template molecules [47]. Each partition behaves as an individual PCR reactions –as with real-time PCR—fluorescent FAM probes [or others, as VIC fluorescence]. Samples containing amplified products are considered positive (1, fluorescent), and those without product –with little or no fluorescence (i.e., are negative, 0). The ratio of positives to negatives in each sample is the basis of amplification. Unlike real-time qPCR, dPCR does not rely on the number of amplification cycles to determine the initial amount of template nucleic acid in each sample, but it relies on Poisson Statistics to determine the absolute template quantity.
The unique sample partitioning step of dPCR, coupled with Poisson Statistics allows for higher precision than both traditional and qPCR methods; thereby allowing for analysis of rare miRNA targets quantitatively and accuratley [47]. The use of a nanofluidic chip, shown below, provides a convenient and straight forward mechanism to run thousands of PCR reactions in parallel. Each well is loaded with a mixture of sample, master mix, and Applied Biosystems TaqMan Assay reagents, and individually analyzed to detect the presence (positive) or absence (negative) of an endpoint signal. To account for wells that may have received more than one molecule of the target sequence, a correction factor is applied using the Poisson model. It features a filter set that is optimized for the FAM™, VIC®, and ROX™ dyes, available from Life Technologies [46]. A workflow of the dPCR procedure by the QuantStudioTM 3D Digital PCR System is presented in (Figure 2) Workflow of a digital miRNAs PCR for colon cancer profiling in human colon tissue or stool samples.
Figure 2: Workflow of a digital miRNAs PCR for colon cancer profiling in human colon tissue or stool samples.
Digital PCR, however, has Several Tips to Follow:
i. A rough estimate of the concentration of miRNAs of interest has to be first carried out, in order to make appropriate dilutions, so that not too many partitions will get multiple copies that prevent accurate calculation of the copy number of miRNAs of interest;ii. Non-template controls and a RT negative control must be set up for each miRNA, when using a “primer pool method” for retro-transcription;
iii. A chip-based dPCR method requires less pipetting steps, which reduces potential PCR contamination compared to another type of dPCR marketed by Bio-Rad Laboratories, thus called “Bio-Rad’s droplet digital PCR”, which requires multiple pipette transfers that potentially increase the risk of contamination [47], and
iv. Quant StudioTM 3D chip has 20,000 fixed reaction wells, whereas Bio-Rad’s droplet PCR relies upon the generation of droplets;
a step that could be extremely variable, as reported by Miotto et al (11,48) Absolute dPCR data tabulated in Tables 1 & 2, and presented graphically in Figure 1 below, which show 14 preferentially expressed mature miRNAs associated with colon cancer (12 Up-Regulated, miR-19a, miR-20a, miR-21, miR-31, miR- 34a, miR-96, miR-106a, miR-133a, miR-135b, miR-206, miR-224 and miR-302; and 2 Down-Regulated, miR-143 and miR-145) in stool samples from healthy controls, and stages 0-1 to 4 individuals with colon cancer . Standard deviations (sd) obtained from the one-way ANOVA, using the 5 level factor Type (normal, stage01, stage2, stage3, stage4) were calculated. The adjusted R-squared values representing the proportion of variation explained by Type are also reported. Type was statistically significant for every gene; all p-values were less than 0.000001 (no adjustments for multiple comparisons). These data are tabulated in Table 3 and shown graphically in Figure 1. For each gene on the graph in Figure 1, the min and max have been shown, in order to make the presentation clearer. At top left is high exxpression Value of 9985, which is the maximum value for that gene, at the bottom one finds the value for the minimum the colors range from dark blue (control) to orange (stage 4).
Table 3: Representation of SDs and R2 for miRNAs tested by absolute digital PCR.
The groups are also distinguished by line type: control (solid),
stage 0-1 (long dash), stage 2 (dash), stage 3 (dot), stage 4 (dash
nd dot). The figure is a parallel coordinate plot made in R, using
the package MASS. For statistical analysis. Innovation and Clininical
Significance of the dPCR-miRNA Diagnostic Stool Screening
Approach Innovation lies in the collective use of many methods, such
as: immunoparamagnetic beads to capture colonocytes from the
harsh, noninvasive stool environment, whose extracted fragile total
small RNA is stabilized shortly after stool excretion by commercial
kits so it does not ever fragment, followed by standardized analytical
quantitative miRNA dPCR-chip profiling in stool samples, which are
neither labor intensive, nor require extensive sample preparation,
to develop a panel of few stable miRNAs for absolute quantitative
diagnostic screening of early sporadic colon cancer (stage 0-1),
cheaper, with higher sensitivity and specificity than any other colon
cancer screening test on the market . Isolation of colonocytes from
stool samples is needed to provide a quantitative estimate of how
our proposed miRNA method performs. Although we may miss
exosome RNA, a parallel test could also be carried out on miRNAs
obtained from stool samples to compare the extent of loss when
colonocytes are only used, and an appropriate correction for
exsosomal loss can be made [48]. Figure 3 Absolute Quantification
of Up- or Down-Regulated miRNAs in Human Stool by Quant Studio
TM 3D Digital PCR Chip System.
Figure 3: Absolute Quantification of Up- or Down-Regulated miRNAs in Human Stool by QuantStudioTM 3D Digital PCR
Chip System.
Acknowledgments
Read More Lupine Publishers Surgery Journal Articles : https://surgery-casestudies-lupine-publishers.blogspot.com/
Read More Lupine Publishers Articles : https://lupinepublishers.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment