Lupine Publishers | Surgery & Case Studies: Open Access Journal
Introduction: Given the frequency of blood transfusion in the intensive care unit, it must be performed according to
the recommendations to ensure transfusion safety. The aim of our study is to describe the practice of transfusion in a surgical
resuscitation service.
Methods: This is a 21-month retrospective and descriptive
study (January 2015 - September 2016) in the Department of
Surgical Resuscitation of the University Hospital JRA Antananarivo
Madagascar. All patients over 15 years old and transfused during
the study period are included.
Results: 937 patients were transfused, with a transfusion rate of 25.3%. A male predominance (sex ratio = 2.21) was found with
an average age of 45.93 (± 17.74) years. Digestive haemorrhage and postoperative cases are common reasons for transfusion. The
blood count and the haemostasis assessment were performed in 58.38% and 50.48% of pre-transfusion patients, respectively. The
red blood cell (RBC) is the most used (54.72%), followed by Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) (28.68%) and then there have been cases of
use of Platelet – Rich Plasma (PRP) (12.93%) and Whole Blood (2.67%). The transfusion event occurred only in 0.43% of patients.
Conclusion: The realities of the country explain the insufficiency of biological arguments for transfusion. And the absence of a
well-defined haemovigilance system makes transfusion accidents unrecognized and undeclared. Hence the interest of a transfusion
protocol adapted to the Malagasy context.
Introduction
A blood crase disorder is a common occurrence in Intensive
Care Unit (ICU) [1]. In general, it is anaemia or a haemostasis
disorder. These disorders are at the same time the consequence
of the initial pathology motivating the admission in resuscitation
but also a factor of aggravation of the pre - existing pathology or
the pathology responsible for the admission [2]. To correct these
disorders, the use of transfusion is often necessary. But for a good
practice of transfusion, like any therapeutic act, it must respect
some recommendations [3]. So, this study was done in order
to describe the practice of transfusion in intensive care unit of
University Hospital /JRA, Antananarivo, Madagascar. accidents, and the blood tests before and after transfusion
(haemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin level). The data were
processed by the XLSTAT software version 2019 and the results
are expressed as mean with standard deviation, minimum and
maximum, and as a percentage.
Results
Table 1: General characteristics.
Of the 3700 patients hospitalized in the department during the
study period, 937 patients (25.3%) met the inclusion criteria. The
average age of these transfused patients was 45.93 (± 17.74) years;
with a minimum age of 15, the maximum age was 92. The male gender
was predominant (645 patients, 68.83%, sex ratio = 2.21). Digestive
haemorrhages and post-operated cases held the top spots in the
pathologies presented by these transfused patients, with 43.12%
and 41.83% respectively. On the other hand, other pathologies
(such as trauma, haemoptysis, haematuria, inflammatory anaemia,
leukaemia, various tumours, shock conditions, etc.) were also
significant as a reason for blood transfusion with a total of 15.05%
(Table 1). Of the 937 patients transfused; before transfusion,
58.38% had a blood count and 50.48% had a haemostasis test;
and after the transfusion, only 23.80% had a blood count and the
haemostasis assessment was performed in 16% of the patients. The
mean haemoglobin level ranged from 92.49 (± 32.49) g/l during
the pre-transfusion period to 105.78 (± 22.27) g/l post transfusion.
Mean pre-transfusion platelet count was 185.26 (± 117.61) giga / l
and 193.70 (± 125.47) giga/l in post transfusion. The prothrombin
level (PL) was 62.17 (± 22.74) % before transfusion and 67.13 (±
20.26) % after transfusion (Table 2). Simple transfusion accounted
for 99.79% and transfusion exchange 0.21%. The total amount
of blood units received by the patients was 3410 with 54.72%
red blood cell (RBC), 28.68% fresh frozen plasma (FFP), 12.93%
platelet rich plasma (PRP) and 2.67% Whole Blood (WB). Each
patient receives on average 2 units of RBC, 1 unit of FFP, 0.5 unit
of PRP (Figure 1). There were only 4 cases of transfusion accident
including 3 urticarial and 1 dyspnoea andchills.
Figure 1: Variation of transfused LBPs.
Table 2: Evolution of biological test in pre and post transfusion.
Hb: Haemoglobin; PLT: Platelet; PL: Prothrombin Level; Pre: Pre-Transfusion; Post: Post Transfusion
Discussion
Resuscitation or intensive care unit is the place where admitted
a patient whose vital function is at risk or likely to be.
Haematological
disorder can enter in this framework of vital function. And often,
transfusion is necessary to correct these disturbances. In our
case, the frequency of transfusion is 25.3%. In other countries
such as Ivory Coast, Denmark, and Canada, they have found
transfusion frequency rates of 20%, 25%, and 38% respectively
[4-6]. And still according to these studies, these figures are quite
high and a policy of reducing consumption of LBP deserves to be
implemented. Regarding the profile of transfused patients, there
is a male predominance with a low average age (45 years). Unlike
those found in studies conducted in occidental countries where
the average age is around 60 years [7,8]. The advantage of this
relatively low age is the existence of low tolerance thresholds for
anaemia; in general, the haemoglobin trigger is 70g/l for a young
patient with no antecedent [9]. And for the pathologies presented
by these transfused patients, these are the same etiologies that
are reported in the literature; that is, trauma, heavy surgery and
gastrointestinal bleeding, but of varying proportions [10]. And
about the transfusion itself - apart from a simple transfusion, there
is, but in a small proportion, the practice of transfusion exchanges
in our case. Erythrocyte transfusion exchange is most often
indicated during complications of sickle cell disease [11], which is
similar to our case. And the use of CGR is the most common in our
practice due to the frequency of anaemia during hospitalization in
resuscitation. According to the literature, more than 55% of patients
admitted to resuscitation have a haemoglobin level of less than
90g/l [10]. In our case, the average pre-transfusion haemoglobin
level was 92.49 g / and there was a one-point post-transfusion
gain for the haemoglobin level. It should be noted that the pre- and
post-transfusion biological assessment rate in our practice is quite
low. Since the biological assessment for deciding a transfusion
or not is not always available, a study, similar to that carried out
by Kranenburg FJ et al. [12] who sought predictive factors for
transfusion, deserves to be instituted. This is in order to properly
codify the transfusion practice by limiting the consumption of LBP
and avoiding its complications. However, these complications can
be dangerous and engage the prognosis of the patient [13]. In our
case, the frequency rate of these complications is abnormally low.
Three contingencies can explain this Figure 1, so that the frequency
of these accidents is so low, it would require a quality technical
platform and a good haemovigilance system; which is not our case.
The other eventualities would be that other cases of transfusion
complications exist but remain undeclared or unknown, hence the
interest of protocolisation of transfusion safety [14].
Conclusion
This study allowed us to profile transfused patients and describe
the practice of transfusion in a surgical resuscitation of a university
hospital in Madagascar. In this time of LBP shortage [15], this study
could improve transfusion practice not only by streamlining the use
of PSLs, but also to limit transfusion accidents.
Read More Lupine Publishers Surgery and Case Reports
Journal Articles: https://surgery-casestudies-lupine-publishers.blogspot.com/